- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
关于个人信息范围的认定,民事法律与刑事法律相关表述不完全一致,在司法实践中个人信息保护普遍存在“刑广民窄”“刑易民难”“刑前民后”“刑重民轻”等“刑严民宽”问题。在办案中应坚持“刑民一体化”思路,对个人信息范围进行一体化认定,一体化解释“等外”类型的个人信息范围。建议适度调整刑事、民事司法保护手段,激活个人信息刑事保护与民事保护两大功能,从而构建“刑民一体化”个人信息司法保护体系,维护个人信息安全。
<<The affirmation of the scope of personal information is not consistent in China’s civil litigation and criminal litigation. In judicial practice,the protection of personal information differs generally in criminal litigation and civil litigation. The criminal litigation prescribes a wider,easier and severer protection for personal information while in civil litigation,personal information protection is rather narrower,more difficult and lenient. The idea of “criminal and civil integration” should be adhered to in handling cases,the scope of “personal information” should be identified in an integrated manner,and the scope of “and so on” personal information should be explained integrally. It is suggested that the the criminal and civil judicial protection methods be appropriately adjusted to activate the two functions of criminal protection and civil protection of personal information,so as to build a “criminal-civilian integration” personal information judicial protection system and maintain personal information security.
<<Keywords: | Personal Information ProtectionInconsistency In Civil Litigation And Criminal LitigationSevere Criminal Litigation And Lenient Civil LitigationCriminal And Civil Integration |